We Mind the Gap
We Mind the Gap: Representation of Disability and Neurodivergence in Democracy
We Mind the Gap: Representation of Disability and Neurodivergence in Democracy
A conference bringing the University of Southampton into dialogue with the themes of UK Disability History Month 2026
Date: Monday 23 rd November : Registrations and refreshments, 9:00-9:30am, with a welcome address from Professor Pascal Matthias, Associate Vice-President of EDI and Social Justice, followed by parallel sessions with lunch and networking until 14:30pm.
Please join the group for the annual flag raising event commencing at 14:30pm, Jubilee Plaza.
Venue: Garden Court and Hartley Suite , University of Southampton, Highfield Campus
Refreshments and Lunch provided.
Join in-person. Booking is essential.
Please note that the event may be live streamed.
The theme for this year’s UK Disability History Month, ‘Disability, Politics and Democracy,’ is extremely timely. Current research reveals a ‘disability democracy deficit’ in the UK, referring to the systematic exclusion of disabled people from political life (Disability Policy Centre, 2024). Despite disabled people making up roughly a quarter of the UK population, they are severely underrepresented in elected offices at different levels of government. Only a tiny fraction of UK Members of Parliament (MPs) identifies as having a disability or long-term health condition (Office for Equality and Opportunity, 2025). Those who do are likely to encounter multiple barriers to representation, from the accessibility of venues, facilities and materials to cultural barriers, including a lack of awareness, knowledge and interest (Evans and Reher, 2021).
Yet disability is not only a matter of political participation or representation. It is also a legal, social and political category through which institutions determine their responses to human difference. Decisions about welfare, education, healthcare, employment, housing and transport are shaped by how disability is understood, defined and administered. Disability politics therefore concerns not only access to democratic life, but also the systems through which disability is governed. As disability scholar and activist Michael Oliver (2009) observed, disabled people have held positions of considerable political power without necessarily engaging disability as a political issue. While disabled identities may be downplayed in public life, disability remains part of how people encounter institutions, public services and state authority.
At the same time, democracy in the UK is under strain. Debates surrounding contemporary threats to democracy have focused on disinformation and attacks on media freedoms, the erosion of minority rights, and the resurgence of political extremism. These developments show how questions of disability intersect with other forms of political marginalisation as well as wider concerns around power, citizenship and belonging. Democracy also extends beyond elections and political institutions; it is reflected in everyday civic life and…
